Documentation
Regarding ICC Sin Lists
The following documentation will show an accurate, chronological display of televised and written material regarding the International Church of Christ's compilation and distribution of members' confidentially confessed sins and will document the ICC organization's entire public response.
- Background- before May of 1993
- May 19, 1993: NewsCenter 5 (WCVB/ABC TV) Investigative Reports
- October 15, 1993: ABC Television's "20/20" Program
- December, 1993: Canadian Broadcasting Corp's "5th Estate" Program
- May, 1994: "Inside Edition" Program
- NEW! FAQ coming soon.
- Question Raised
- Brief Excerpts of the "Sin List" Document
During one-on-one Bible studies, persons joining the International Church of Christ (ICC) confess their most embarrassing and intimate sins to members, who then use knowledge of the person's weaknesses to better "suit the study's needs." Upon joining the group, new "disciples" begin a life-style of regular confession to their leaders and other "disciples" in the church (James 5:16). Subsequently, very personal information becomes the primary focus of cell "discipling groups" in the church.
For several years, allegations of confidentiality violations were a common denominator among a large number of ex-members. Former members often claimed leaders had used knowledge of their sins to pressure them coercively or to predict imminent failure should they decide to leave the church. The sheer weight and wide-spread nature of these allegations were more than enough to prompt consideration of their validity and consequences. However, leaders simply attributed these allegations to "bitter ex-members"; rigid, convincing proof was nowhere to be found.
In Spring 1993, however, a former zone leader of the Boston Church of Christ (BCC) revealed a lengthy computer print-out containing all the names of BCC members, and - more importantly - disclosing many personal details of their sexual sins, failures, past relationships, racial differences, or perceived mental stability - all assembled into a single document: a congregational "Sin List". Equally shocking was the list's origin. The former zone leader stated he had personally received it from Boston Church of Christ "Elder/Teacher" Gordon Ferguson.
The months following the document's revelation contain multiple exposures of the ICC's blatant violation of its members' confidentiality. The reader is encouraged to develop a full understanding of the circumstances and personalities surrounding the Sin Lists' exposure.
May 19, 1993
Interviewer:
- "Are their [members'] confessions confidential?"
Gordon Ferguson:
- "Yes."
Interviewer:
- "Former members say that the confidentiality of their confessions was broken routinely."
Gordon Ferguson:
- "Well, that's not the way we normally do business. I mean,
I don't know the specifics you're talking about
- or if there are some, I would not say that things like that have not occurred, but I do know that our emphasis is on confidentiality because we are talking about close relationships."
October 15, 1993
Interviewer:
- "Do you keep these confessions confidential?"
Al Baird:
- "I absolutely keep them confidential, and I teach that they should be kept confidential."
Interviewer:
- "Then what about this 'Sin List' that's passed around?
Al Baird:
- "I don't know of a sin list. Show me a sin list that gets passed around by leaders of the church."
[interviewer shows list to Baird]
Interviewer:
- "You haven't seen this?"
Al Baird:
- "I'm not familiar with this. If this exists, this is totally wrong, and if I found out that someone did this, this could even be grounds for their dismissal."
December, 1993
[Interviewer holds up sin list.]
Interviewer:
- "This is dirt on people. How they're performing, recruiting people, what their sexual peccadilloes may have been."
Al Baird:
- "I don't know what you want me to say. I said I don't approve of that."
Interviewer:
- "Scott Deal [former top-echelon leader from Toronto, Canada] said that this information wasn't always written down, but that it was passed around, talked about. . . "
Al Baird:
- "We do not keep lists like that.
I have never seen a list like that."
- Baird said on "20/20" that he believes the list "is totally wrong" and "could even be grounds for dimissal" (10/15/93). Yet later the same month, Baird received confirmed proof of the list's authenticty and its origin (letter, 10/26/93). Now, he still maintains his stance: "I don't approve of that" (12/93). However, swift and appropriate minesterial discipline had never taken place.
Given these facts, coupled with Baird's lie about his knowledge of the lists, is ICC's top echelon really able to discipline itself - accepting direction and reproof - to keep corruption out of its upper-most tier of leadership?If not, then what is one to conclude about the orgnization?"Inside Edition" Program, May, 1994 [Sin List presented to Al Baird]
Al Baird:- "It wasn't circulated.
- And someone took the list, and gave it to you."
Interviewer:- "The things on this list should have never gone beyond the person, the disciple."
Al Baird:- "That's exactly [right]. The leader of that group. The leader of the group must know his people."
Interviewer:- "Oh, so the leader should know my sins?"
Al Baird:- "No, not all your sins. But he's got to know the sins that you're, on-going basis, struggling with."
- Has the ICC's teaching on confidentiality changed between Fall 1993 and Spring 1994? Baird once condemned the same sin lists on ABC's "20/20" and later maintained his disapproval on CBC's "5th Estate". Why does Baird now defend them?
- It is important to realize, that in order for confessions to be passed "from one leader to another", they must first have traveled between a whole chain of persons gathering and compiling information! Several persons in the ICC would have to violate members' confidentiality, passing sins "up the line", before leaders could even acquire a complete list!
- Baird's new attitude implies that passing members' confessions "from one leader to another" is now an accepted, standard practice. Do the ICC's members know about this practice? Where is the Biblical precedence for passing disciples' sins and violating their confidentiality? Why did Baird diametrically change his opinion about the congregational sin lists?
Written by: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.The author of this page respects all opinions, pro-ICC or otherwise. Please feel free to e-mail any suggestions, complaints, (dis)agreements, or words of support.
To top of this page.
To see more documents/articles regarding this group/organization/subject click here. - Has the ICC's teaching on confidentiality changed between Fall 1993 and Spring 1994? Baird once condemned the same sin lists on ABC's "20/20" and later maintained his disapproval on CBC's "5th Estate". Why does Baird now defend them?





